Modern Science: The Trojan Horse of Occultism
SKU: 8359478609

Modern Science: The Trojan Horse of Occultism

Sale price$26.95 Regular price$29.95
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 6 - Jul 11

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Modern Science: The Trojan Horse of OccultismThe Royal Society of London was the first epistemological cartel to really make that leap into the legitimization of Scientism, including pedagogy on Evolutionary Biology, Heliocentrism, Gravitational Theory, The Copernican Principle, Astronomy, and Natural Science. Though most of their Natural Science endeavors were anchored in Babylonian Hermeticism, Alchemical Magick, and the Rosicrucianism of Sir Francis Bacon, they were able to mask these

The Royal Society of London was the first epistemological cartel to really make that leap into the legitimization of Scientism, including pedagogy on Evolutionary Biology, Heliocentrism, Gravitational Theory, The Copernican Principle, Astronomy, and Natural Science. Though most of their ÒNatural ScienceÓ endeavors were anchored in Babylonian Hermeticism, Alchemical Magick, and the Rosicrucianism of Sir Francis Bacon, they were able to mask these underpinnings by rebranding their pedagogy as empirical science, thereby establishing the foundations of modern science as a Trojan Horse for occultism, resulting in the start of long legacy of epistemological front groups such as The Vatican Jesuits, The Freemasons, and The Illuminati, all of which who would further disseminate The Royal SocietyÕs occult doctrines behind the same banner of so-called, Òlegitimate empirical scienceÓ.

Merely look at what they were teaching:

The Copernican Principle
Heliocentrism
Gravity
Evolutionary Theory
An Expanding Universe
Astrophysics,
Astronomy

For all their preaching of the merits of the scientific method, everything they taught, and currently do teach, is anchored in occult fantasy, which was cleverly repackaged as legitimate material science. The Royal Society was the perfect subterfuge and Trojan Horse for advancing their occult agendas and ideas under the radar. On the surface, The Royal Society sought to realize Sir Francis Bacon's vision of experimental science as a collective activity undertaken for the good of The State. However, Bacon's connection to the Rosicrucians and the Freemasons has been widely discussed by authors and scholars in many books.

Andreas Sommer, in his article in PSI Encyclopedia, says this about the Òscientific revolutionÓ of the 16th Êand 17th Centuries:

ÒThe scientific revolution of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries Ð represented by pioneers such as Francis Bacon, Johannes Kepler, Galileo, Robert Boyle and Isaac Newton Ð is often considered to have liberated humanity from religious oppression and superstition. It was at this time, one commentator writes, that modern notions of Ôa sharp distinction between normal and paranormal, between science and pseudoscience, reality and magicÕ began to form, and ever since, these boundaries have Ôdivided parapsychology from conventional scienceÕ.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 8359478609

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 2222 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 4
Decent quality, good color, bad shipping package
Size: King (20" X 36"), Color: 14 - Blush Pink, Number of Items: 2, Size: King (20" X 36"), Color: 14 - Blush Pink, Number of Items: 2
You pay for the quality you get. I think they’re thick & soft enough and the coloring is spot on. However, like other reviews, it was shipped not inside an Amazon box but the actual company slip packaging & the tape was already off with some of the pillow cover sticking out. They should change how they ship them, I would have given it 5 stars.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 24, 2025
T
Verified Purchase
Trice
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Well made and soft
Size: Queen (20" X 30"), Color: 09 - Slate Blue, Number of Items: 2
Very soft pillowcase. Should be wrinkle free. Good value for money.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
Christie Caviness
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
Worth the money
Size: King (20" X 36"), Color: 08 - Grayish Purple, Number of Items: 2
Bedsure king size pillow are soft and comfortable. They are very light weight and durable, they wash well with no color fading. The color is beautiful and a good value for the money.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Marcia J.
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Why would you want anything else?
Size: Standard (20" X 26"), Color: 02 - White, Number of Items: 2
I don’t know why anyone would want pillow cases that don’t fit the pillow. These are “envelope” style meaning the pillow tucks inside them for a perfect fit—no “leftover” pillowcase sticking out on the end. They’re very soft and cooling and I have so far bought ones for every bed in my house and will be getting more as extras. Highly recommend!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2026
B
Verified Purchase
Betty
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 3
Very soft
Size: Body (20" X 54"), Color: 06 - Sage Green, Number of Items: 1
The color was perfect. It’s very soft. The only thing that I really don’t like is the finish of the opening, it would be better with a zipper closure.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 13, 2026

recommand products